
The Madagascar Plan represents a chilling chapter in the history of Nazi Germany’s antisemitic policies. Developed primarily between 1938 and 1940, the plan envisioned the forced resettlement of Europe’s Jewish population to the island of Madagascar, then a French colony. While it was never implemented, the Madagascar Plan reveals the trajectory of Nazi ideology and how the regime explored various means to pursue the exclusion, displacement, and eventual extermination of the Jewish people. This blog explores the origins, development, ideological foundations, international context, and eventual abandonment of the Madagascar Plan, highlighting its role as a precursor to the Holocaust.
Franz Rademacher, head of the Jewish Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the German government, proposed the idea in June 1940, shortly before the Fall of France.
Origins and Ideological Foundations
The idea of resettling Jews outside of Europe predates the Nazi regime. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, various antisemitic thinkers and politicians proposed the mass emigration of Jews to remote colonies, often framed as a “solution” to what they termed the “Jewish Question.” Madagascar emerged as one of several territories suggested due to its remoteness, size, and the perception that it could support a large population.
Nazi ideology, deeply rooted in antisemitism and racial pseudo-science, increasingly framed Jews as a threat to the purity, security, and prosperity of the German Volk (people). Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (1925) makes repeated reference to the removal of Jews from German society. However, it was not until the Nazi consolidation of power in the 1930s that these ideas began to morph into concrete policies. Initially, Nazi antisemitism focused on legal discrimination, economic exclusion, and social ostracization. The Nuremberg Laws (1935) formalized racial definitions and codified antisemitism into German law.
By the late 1930s, emigration became the primary policy mechanism for the Nazis to reduce the Jewish population in Germany and Austria. However, with over half a million Jews still residing in Germany and hundreds of thousands more in newly annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, Nazi officials sought a more sweeping and “final” territorial solution.
Development of the Madagascar Plan
The concept of deporting Jews to Madagascar gained serious attention within the Nazi leadership after the swift defeat of France in June 1940. Madagascar, a French colony, was now potentially within German reach as part of the expected peace settlement with the defeated French government. The plan was most notably advanced by Adolf Eichmann, then an SS officer working under Reinhard Heydrich in the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA).

A memorandum dated August 15, 1940, drafted by Eichmann, outlined the practical considerations for deporting four million European Jews to Madagascar over the course of four years. The SS envisioned Madagascar as a “giant Jewish reservation” administered by the SS and isolated from the rest of the world. The plan called for the Jews to be governed by a Nazi-appointed police force and would effectively function as a vast open-air prison. It was never framed as a humanitarian relocation effort but rather as a tool of domination and gradual extermination through harsh living conditions, inadequate resources, and isolation.
The Madagascar Plan also aligned with the Nazis’ broader geopolitical goals. By removing Jews from Europe, the regime hoped to appease antisemitic sentiments across the continent, reshape European demographics, and demonstrate German resolve in solving what they viewed as a pan-European problem.
Practical Obstacles and Abandonment
Despite the detailed planning, the Madagascar Plan was ultimately unfeasible. First, the German navy lacked the logistical capacity to transport millions of people across the globe, especially while the Battle of Britain was ongoing and the Royal Navy still controlled key sea lanes. Furthermore, the plan required the cooperation or capitulation of France and Britain, neither of which materialized.
The British rejection of peace terms in 1940 and their continued resistance made overseas deportation impossible. The defeat of the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain and the delayed invasion of the Soviet Union further undermined any hope of executing a large-scale transcontinental deportation plan.
By 1941, following the German invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa) and the beginning of the “Final Solution,” the Nazi leadership formally abandoned the Madagascar Plan. Instead, the regime turned toward the systematic extermination of the Jewish population in occupied Eastern Europe.

The Wannsee Conference in January 1942 marked the formal coordination of the genocide, confirming that resettlement schemes like Madagascar had been permanently replaced by mass murder.
Significance and Legacy
The Madagascar Plan holds a unique place in Holocaust historiography. It exemplifies a transitional phase in Nazi policy between forced emigration and genocide. While not intended as a humanitarian alternative, the plan demonstrates that mass murder was not initially the only considered “solution.” Its failure was a critical pivot point toward the implementation of the Holocaust.
The plan also underscores the Nazi regime’s commitment to a racial worldview that saw Jews as an existential enemy requiring total removal from Europe. That they seriously considered turning an entire island into a massive penal colony for Jews, administered by the SS, reveals the extent of their genocidal imagination even before the gas chambers of Auschwitz.
Furthermore, the Madagascar Plan illustrates how antisemitic policies were influenced by war, geopolitics, and logistical considerations. It reflects the interplay between ideology and pragmatism in the Nazi state, where fanatical goals were continually adapted to shifting military realities.
The Madagascar Plan was a deeply antisemitic and authoritarian proposal that ultimately gave way to even more horrific policies. While never implemented, its conceptualization offers crucial insight into the evolving nature of Nazi racial policy and the early steps that led to genocide. The plan was not merely a footnote in the Nazi persecution of Jews but a reflection of the ideological and logistical machinations that culminated in the Holocaust. Studying it not only deepens our understanding of the Holocaust’s origins but also serves as a grim reminder of how deeply entrenched hatred can manifest in state policy.
Sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%205398.pdf
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110970470-018/html?lang=en
Please support us so we can continue our important work.
Donation
Your readership is what makes my site a success, and I am truly passionate about providing you with valuable content. I have been doing this at no cost and will continue to do so. Your voluntary donation of $2 or more, if you are able, would be a significant contribution to the continuation of my work. However, I fully understand if you’re not in a position to do so. Your support, in any form, is greatly appreciated. Thank you. To donate, click on the credit/debit card icon of the card you will use. If you want to donate more than $2, just add a higher number in the box left from the PayPal link. Your generosity is greatly appreciated. Many thanks.
$2.00
Leave a comment